Does Size Really Matter?
I've been noticing how much my reading has changed over the years, and boy has it changed. One of the biggest things I have noticed is my aversion to big books. As a teenager and well up to a couple of years ago my motto was "the bigger the better".


I discovered the genre of chick lit after picking up Bridget Jones Diary at a library. After that I couldn't get enough of it. Of course, I swayed towards the big books. Anything less than 400 pages I didn't want. I was use to my Briskin's and Michael's size. Even when I joined PBS I would look at page count, and if it had less than 350 pages I just wasn't going to order or WL it even if it sounded great. Wierd, I know but that was just my preference.
Now for the last probably 2 years I can't get myself to want to read a really big book. I still have Stephen King's Under the Dome and Duma Key in my TBR, as well as other popular big books. Don't get me wrong I want to read them but now they seem so time consuming. I think because now I have so many books I dont' want to spend so much time on just one.
I kind of miss the days of old when I was just glad to be reading. I wasn't worried about all the books I haven't read, but was concentrating on what I was reading at the time.
Jacqueline Briskin, Judith Michael I think back on you with fond memories. I don't miss getting made fun of though because of those crappy covers, but your stories were magnificently weaved, and your heros were to die for.
I also want to add that I kind of outgrown the chick lit phase. I read them every now and then, but it use to be all I read. My local library now has a wonderful collection of chick lit books thanks to yours truly.
What do think about size?